星期四, 12月 29, 2005

Inverse yield curve

Yields on Bonds Invert, ReflectingUnease About Economy's Future

By MARK WHITEHOUSE
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
December 28, 2005

The nation's bond market interrupted the holiday season with a downbeat message yesterday: Many investors expect the economy to hit tougher times within the next year or so.
That pronouncement came in the form of long-term interest rates dropping below short-term rates, a trend that often -- but not always -- precedes an economic downturn. The development is known as an inversion, because it flips the traditionally upward-sloping shape of bond yields plotted on a graph. The yield curve typically rises because longer-term debt usually pays higher interest rates to compensate investors for the greater risk they incur waiting for repayment.
Inversions can squeeze or even eliminate profit margins for banks, hedge funds and any other financial business that borrows money at short-term rates and lends it at long-term rates. "This is a warning signal...that we are on recession watch now," says Paul Kasriel, chief economist at Northern Trust Co. in Chicago. The inversion, however, so far is minor, he says. And some economists believe an inversion isn't as reliable a predictor as it once was.

In late New York trading, the yield on the 10-year Treasury note, which reflects investors' long-term view of the economy and is a key benchmark for mortgage loans, had dropped just slightly below the yield on the two-year note, which tracks expectations for the Federal Reserve's monetary policy in the nearer term. The 10-year note's price was up ¼ point, or $2.50 for each $1,000 in face value, to yield 4.343%. The two-year note was up 1/32 point to yield 4.347%, and the 30-year bond was up 21/32 to yield 4.508%.
The bond market's gloom may seem incongruous, given that inflation remains under control and the economy grew at an annual rate of 4.1% in the third quarter, marking the eighth straight quarter of one of the most stable stretches of growth on record. Analysts cautioned against reading too much into the timing of the inversion, which came amid a dearth of economic or other market-moving news and amid thin holiday dealings. Still, it was the first inversion in five years, and many see it as a signal of bigger, sustained moves to come. It was also cited as a factor behind a weaker stock market yesterday. (See related article.)
"The big question is how dramatic [the inversion] becomes," says Thomas Girard, co-head of fixed income at Weiss Peck & Greer Investments in New York.
Bonds make fixed interest and principal payments to investors, but their yield depends on what the market is willing to pay for the bonds on any given day. In deciding what yield -- or return -- to demand on bonds, investors consider various factors, including their expectations for future short-term interest rates and the bond's duration.
Investors, for example, usually demand more yield from governments and companies to tie up their money in longer-term bonds. When they are willing to accept a lower yield, that means they are persuaded that the Fed, which most expect to raise short-term rates to 4.5% or higher early next year, will soon have to bring those rates back down to mitigate, or ward off, a recession. Yield-curve inversions have preceded all of the last six recessions, but have also sounded two false alarms, the most recent in 1998.
The housing market is the most likely trigger for an economic slowdown and Fed reversal. As the Fed raises rates, monthly payments on adjustable-rate home loans go up, cooling demand for houses and leaving homeowners with less money to spend on all the other things companies want to sell them. Second, as house prices stall, homeowners aren't able to borrow as much against the value of their homes -- a source of cash that has added hundreds of billions of dollars to consumers' spending power in recent years.
"What the Fed is going to do is shut down the ATM machine known as the housing market," says Tad Rivelle, chief investment officer at Metropolitan West Asset Management in Los Angeles. Fed policy makers hold their next meeting on Jan. 31, which is expected to be the last before Chairman Alan Greenspan retires, leaving the reins to Ben Bernanke, the nominee to succeed him.
The Fed's attempts to cool the economy, however, don't always provoke a recession, and many economists, including Mr. Greenspan, suggest that the yield curve might have lost its predictive abilities. That's because foreign buying of U.S. Treasurys and the Fed's success in controlling inflation have kept long-term interest rates unusually low, so U.S. consumers and companies still have relatively cheap access to money that they can spend on buying houses and building factories.
A recent study published by the Fed estimated that in the absence of foreign buying, the difference between two-year and 10-year yields would be about 0.75 percentage point greater.
"Many factors can affect the slope of the yield curve, and these factors do not all have the same implications for future output growth," Mr. Greenspan wrote in a recent letter to Congress.
But even if it doesn't presage recession, a severe and prolonged inversion can cause a lot of pain, particularly for banks and hedge funds that make long-term investments with money borrowed at short-term rates -- the so-called carry trade. Big banks such as Citigroup Inc.'s Citibank unit and J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. have already cited the flattening yield curve as a factor affecting profits, as the interest rate they must pay to attract deposits rises closer to the return they can expect on their investments. "You can't make it up on volume if you're borrowing at 4.25% and lending at 4%," Northern Trust's Mr. Kasriel says.

星期三, 12月 07, 2005

好文章欣賞:陳方安生出來做什麼?

筆陣:梁文道

陳方安生出來做什麼?

正如蔡子強兄所說的,近日香港政局真可說是「波譎雲詭」,相當耐人尋味。尤其值得注意的是十二月四日25萬人爭取普選大遊行之前,先有45條關注組正式組黨,後有陳方安生高調參與遊行,這兩件事對未來的形勢有何影響?二者之間又有沒有聯繫呢?
先談45條關注組在大遊行宣布組黨,從時機上講實在是再對也沒有了。自從「大狀黨」在03年七一大遊行一炮而紅之後,他們可能食髓知味,了解到群眾運動的魅力和造勢的能量,發現遊行原來可以變相地轉換成慶祝組黨的集會。對整個民主運動而言,45條關注組諸君無異於為社會注入了一股形象高潔的清流,可喜可賀。問題只是對於其他民主黨派會不會造成衝擊。
相對而言,45條關注組的弱點之一正是形象太過專業太過高級,略有不食人間煙火之相。且看其公布的成員名單,除了廖銀鳳等少數基層代表之外,恐怕都是平均學歷碩士以上的專業人士。而梁家傑更不諱言在入黨人選的資格上「有要求」,且不忘強調自己「大律師的背景」怎樣影響了理性思維。一不小心,這就容易變成脫離群眾和自高自傲的表現了。試想,如果基層民主派如「阿牛」曾健成等發起大規模入黨運動的話,難道要先考「語文基準試」不成?
好在他們黨團立法會議員裏面還有一向左傾的張超雄,不管這是為了要湊成「關鍵六票」等策略性思維的結果,還是真正的理念相合,到底也是良好信號。兩種情裏面,我寧願相信這是真正的理念同盟,理由是在反對取消遺產稅、爭取最低工資和標準工時等議題上,「大狀黨」都令人驚喜地站在基層的立場。大概是有了從政經驗,接觸到了香港社會的現實。
因此就意識形態而言,45條關注組有傾向社會民主黨的勢頭,同時保留了精英問政的色彩,可說全方面包抄了民主派第一大黨民主黨的路子。相應於此,民主黨該怎麼走下去呢?論中產,是鬥不過45條關注組的了;社會經濟政策向左傾吧,現在的大狀黨也不讓你專美。最可見的道路是緊抓中國軸線,更往支聯會一翼靠攏,以區別開45條關注組和中央政府「有偈傾」的印象。不過對很多民主黨溫和派來說,這條硬派路線或許是個很不現實愈走愈窄的一條路。分析下來,民主黨實在有被「併吞」的機會,反正「大狀黨」也亟待發展基層黨工和地區網絡,民主黨確是個現成好「獵物」。
不料螳螂捕蟬,黃雀在後,一二四大遊行的最大贏家居然是臨時殺出的前政務司長陳方安生。說到這位「香港良心」,我在電台主持節目的時候就曾屢次表達相當有保留的看法,現在也就不怕冒天下之大不韙,再補充幾句。陳方安生出任高官數十年,從未表達過任何追求民主普選的公開言論,更不用說有什麼實際動作。她「香港良心」地位得以確立的轉捩點是與董建華不合,被迫離職。由於當時的董政權幾成香港公敵,凡是敵人的敵人,自然就是家的朋友了。
這數年來,陳方安生不時發表言論,才逐漸成為追求民主的市民的同路人。直到一二四大遊行,其所至之處莫不人頭洶湧,主辦單位要動用十人結成人圈保護她行進,風頭一時無兩,甚至被封上了「民主之母」的稱號。司徒華先生奮鬥數十年方有今日為人敬仰的地位;李柱銘為了爭取民主四處奔波換回一頭白髮,才被稱為「民主之父」;就算劉慧卿也屢戰街頭博回「街卿」的惡罵;如今陳方安生華服錦衣出來遊行了半截,就成了「民主之母」,豈不划算?如果曾蔭權不競選連任,兩年後跑出來爭取中國普選,大概又是「中國良心」了。
饒是如此,當今的政改死結卻只有陳方安生一人能解。以她的精明智慧,選擇在時節出來用一個「普通市民」的身分參與遊行(請注意03年七一遊行針對的是「國安」法律,這回則純粹是香港人自己爭取普選),又有風聲早傳又開記者會,被問及是否重返政壇時又答曰「見步行步」,論者普遍以為她志在千里,甚至有問鼎特首寶座的意思。
但這裏的不通之處有二:一、如果陳方安生要選特首,只有政府的政改方案通過才有機會,拿目前800人選委會的結構來看可謂毫無勝算。二、陳方安生參加遊行,高調表態,豈不是與中央「對幹」?沒有北京的祝福,想當特首可不是難上加難?
所以檢視一下當前形勢。從爭取普選的目標來講,香港人要的是清清楚楚的時間表;但從民主派發展壯大的實際角度來看,政府的政改方案則相當有利。所以泛民主派當初爭取的是修改政府方案,不放委任區議員一關。只是後來形勢逼人,一眾泛民議員被架上道德梁山,最後更與25萬人直奔政府總部。在這個局勢底下,沒有統一領導,各自分散的民主派就算想妥協,也沒有哪一派敢先跑出來給石頭砸。除非有一位「共主」或精神導師適時出現。
當今之世,除了陳日君主教以外,還有誰比陳方安生更有道德地位和號召力呢?且看一二四遊行日,她可說是在驗收「市民的支持與愛戴」,聲勢達到頂。如果政府真有第二方案,如果政府真有一套模糊的路線圖並且去掉委任區議員,陳方安生又願意「無奈」地接受的話,恰巧在此時組黨的45條關注組6席議員該怎麼辦?泛民主派又會不會「顧全大局」?
請留意陳方安生只說爭取普選,只說要有時間表,對於方案本身卻沒有表態否定。又如果她只甘於做民主運動的精神領袖,甚至「傳奇烈士」的話,遊行當日又何不一遊到底直搗黃龍呢?假如陳方安生真能公開接受修改後的政府方案,不只泛民有了轉圜餘地,她能正式就任「民主之母」;就連中央政府也不得不收這份大人情吧!如此一來,民情的支持有了,政改開拓出來的參選空間有了,就連北京的祝福也都拿到半份。水到渠成,誰曰不宜?
接下來則是考驗曾蔭權真正質素的時候了,不讓步的話不只與民為敵,而且也有違情理;讓步的話則等於為自己增添一位連任勁敵。左右如何,甚難決定。
對中央而言,下一屆特首選舉如有全港取得最高民意支持度的兩個人對決,實在是最佳戲碼,哪怕還有「外國勢力」指手劃腳說你不民主?至於我等上過街流過汗的庶民,唯望各方精英以蒼生為念,但願陳太經過民意感動之後也能真真正正地蛻變為民主女神,不要忘記我們這25萬人的赤子之心。